• Font Size    
Advertising
E-mail

Close Window E-mail This Page

Controversy Grows Over 9/11 NYC Terrorist Trials

Required fields are marked with an asterisk(*)



The information you provide will be used only to send the requested e-mail and will not be used to send any other e-mail communications. Read more in our Privacy Policy

Send E-mail

   Print     Share +    Comments (2)

Controversy Grows Over 9/11 NYC Terrorist Trials

Civilian Trial Or Dangerous Terrorist Platform?

NEW YORK (CBS) ― The upcoming New York trials of five 9/11 terror suspects are already controversial. But now, one defense lawyer says those proceedings will allow the defendants to spout plenty of criticism of U.S. foreign policy.

Civilian trial or dangerous platform? That is the central question now in the debate over where the self-confessed planners of the 9/11 attacks should be tried.

On Sunday, the attorney for one of the defendants announced the five suspects would all plead not guilty, including Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, self-proclaimed mastermind of the attacks.

The attorney said the terror suspects would not deny their roles in the attack, but would explain "what they did, and why they did it" – using the trial as a political platform to criticize U.S. foreign policy.

Speaking before the Senate Judiciary Committee last week, Attorney General Eric Holder said such rhetoric would only make the suspects look worse.

"I have every confidence that the nation, and the world, will see him for the coward that he is," Holder said. "I'm not scared of what Khalid Sheikh Mohammed has to say at trial, and no one else needs to be afraid either."

"This is what makes America great. They do have a right to their opinion. They can say what they want to say. Everyone who has their heads, who is of right mind knows they were wrong and they will be convicted and dealt with," said Manhattan resident John McKinley.

Holder's critics pushed for the alleged plotters to be tried before a less public military commission, which would have also allowed for a more flexible standard of evidence, and, they say, a safer environment.

"I believe this decision is dangerous," said Senator Jeff Sessions (R-AL). "I believe it is misguided."

Legal observers say while a federal civilian trial will not exactly provide them with an open ended opportunity for full blown propaganda speeches, the suspects may be heard on some level.

Defense attorney Brian Neary, who is not involved with the terror trial, says political banter will have no place and no effect in federal court.

"Politics is generally not one of those things that's considered a defense," Neary said. "Once they get to the penalty phase – whether or not they'll be imposed the death penalty – they may have an opportunity to present their views much more free-wielding.

"But it's not, again, a political opportunity for them to make a speech against America or on behalf of their own political concerns," Neary said.

Scott Fenstermaker represents one of the suspects in a separate civil suit.
He says his client's upcoming criminal trial, set to be held in federal court in lower Manhattan, will not provide a platform for terroristic propaganda.

"Their belief is that there's a defense for it," said Fenstermaker. "They say that they did it, but they want to present their defense and see what the jury thinks."

no image

no image

(© MMX, CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved.)

Add Comment

here. here. Need a log in? Register here
  •  * Will not be displayed with comment
  •  * e.g. (http://www.mywebsite.com)
  •  
  • Click here to refresh with new letters

Close Window Login


Close Window Flag Comment


loading...
You need the latest Flash player to view video content.
Click here to download.

Click here to bypass this detection if you already have the latest Flash Player.