
Dec 13, 2007 6:30 pm US/Eastern
Senate Approves Fuel Economy Increase
WASHINGTON (CBS News) ―
The Senate passed a trimmed-back energy bill Thursday that would bring
higher-gas mileage cars and SUVs into showrooms in the coming decade
and fill their tanks with ethanol.
The measure was approved with strong bipartisan support 86-8 after
Democrats abandoned efforts to impose billions of dollars in new taxes
on the biggest oil companies, unable by one vote to overcome a
Republican filibuster against the new taxes.
The bill now goes to the House, where a vote is expected next week.
The White House issued a statement saying President Bush will sign the
legislation if it reaches his desk, as is expected. Bush had promised a
veto if the oil industry taxes were not removed.
The bill calls for the first major increase by Congress in required
automobile fuel efficiency in 32 years, something the auto companies
have fought for two decades.
The car companies will have to achieve an industrywide average 35
mile per gallon for cars, small trucks and SUVs over the next 13 years,
an increase of 10 mpg over what the entire fleet averages today.
And it would boost use of ethanol to 36 billion gallons a year by
2022, a sevenfold increase, and impose an array of new requirements to
promote efficiency in appliances, lighting and buildings.
This bill "will begin to reverse our addiction to oil. It's a step
to fight global warming," said Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada.
The increased auto efficiency by 2020 will save 1.1 million barrels
of oil of a day, equal to half the oil now imported from the Persian
Gulf, save consumers $22 billion at the pump, and reduce annual
greenhouse gases emissions by 200 million tons, said Sen. Daniel
Inouye, D-Hawaii., whose committee crafted the measure.
"It demonstrates to the world that America is a leader in fighting global warming," he said.
Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., a longtime protector of the auto industry
that is so important to his state, called the fuel economy measure
"ambitious but achievable."
For consumers, the legislation will mean that over the next dozen
years auto companies will likely build more diesel-powered SUVs and
gas-electric hybrid cars as well as vehicles that can run on 85 percent
ethanol. They will push engineers to develop new technologies to save
fuel.
"Automakers can meet the new standards with today's technology,"
said David Friedman, research director at the Union of Concerned
Scientists Clean Vehicle Program. "Cars and trucks will be the same
size and perform the same way they do today."
But they may be using a different fuel.
The energy legislation would require that ethanol use as a motor
fuel be ramped up at an unprecedented pace to 36 billion gallons a year
by 2022. And at least 21 billion gallons will have to be ethanol from
feedstock other than corn such as prairie grasses, switchgrass and wood
chips.
About 6.5 billion gallons of ethanol were expected to be used as a
gasoline additive this year, according to the Renewable Fuels
Association, which represents ethanol producers.
The legislation also would increase energy efficiency requirements
for appliances and federal and commercial buildings and require faster
approval of federal energy efficiency standards.
These measures, said Sen. Jeff Bingaman, D-N.M., "will eventually
save more energy than all our previous energy efficiency measures
combined."
Tax breaks for a wide range of clean energy industries, including
wind, solar, biomass and carbon capture from coal plants, were part of
the tax package that was dropped. Senate Democrats earlier also
abandoned a House-passed provision that would have required
investor-owned utilities nationwide to generate 15 percent of their
electricity from solar, wind and other renewable sources.
While many environmentalists viewed almost certain approval of the
automobile fuel economy increase as a major victory, some were critical
Thursday of the Democrats' inability to push through taxes on major oil
companies, which have been making huge profits in recent years.
"The Senate Democrats should show some backbone," said Brent
Blackwelder, president of Friends of the Earth. "If Republicans want to
block progress on clean energy and global warming, they should be
forced to mount a real filibuster for weeks if necessary."
Republicans had made it clear they would require the Democrats to
find 60 votes on the oil taxes and the White House had said repeatedly
the $13.5 billion in taxes on the five largest oil companies over 10
years would assure a veto.
On the 59-40 vote that failed to overcome a GOP filibuster, Sen.
Mary Landrieu, D-La., whose state's economy is dominated by oil and
energy activities, was the only Democrat to break ranks. Nine
Republicans supported the tax measures.
The White House has said the taxes would lead to higher energy
costs and unfairly single out the oil industry for punishment. A
Democratic analysis showed that the $13.5 billion over 10 years
amounted to 1.1 percent of the net profits that five largest oil
companies would be expected to earn given today's oil prices.
(© 2008 CBS Broadcasting Inc. All Rights Reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed. The Associated Press contributed to this report.)